↓ Skip to main content

Disease Dynamics in a Specialized Parasite of Ant Societies

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
18 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disease Dynamics in a Specialized Parasite of Ant Societies
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0036352
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra B. Andersen, Matthew Ferrari, Harry C. Evans, Simon L. Elliot, Jacobus J. Boomsma, David P. Hughes

Abstract

Coevolution between ant colonies and their rare specialized parasites are intriguing, because lethal infections of workers may correspond to tolerable chronic diseases of colonies, but the parasite adaptations that allow stable coexistence with ants are virtually unknown. We explore the trade-offs experienced by Ophiocordyceps parasites manipulating ants into dying in nearby graveyards. We used field data from Brazil and Thailand to parameterize and fit a model for the growth rate of graveyards. We show that parasite pressure is much lower than the abundance of ant cadavers suggests and that hyperparasites often castrate Ophiocordyceps. However, once fruiting bodies become sexually mature they appear robust. Such parasite life-history traits are consistent with iteroparity--a reproductive strategy rarely considered in fungi. We discuss how tropical habitats with high biodiversity of hyperparasites and high spore mortality has likely been crucial for the evolution and maintenance of iteroparity in parasites with low dispersal potential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Brazil 4 3%
Austria 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 128 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Environmental Science 8 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 23 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 183. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#225,313
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,299
of 225,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#936
of 176,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#42
of 3,697 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,697 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.