↓ Skip to main content

Use of Potentially Nephrotoxic Medications by U.S. Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease: NHANES, 2011–2016

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of Potentially Nephrotoxic Medications by U.S. Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease: NHANES, 2011–2016
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05557-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaheen Kurani, Molly Moore Jeffery, Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir, LaTonya J. Hickson, Erin F. Barreto, Jordan Haag, Rachel Giblon, Nilay D. Shah, Rozalina G. McCoy

Abstract

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at risk for adverse events and/or CKD progression with use of renally eliminated or nephrotoxic medications. To examine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use by U.S. adults by CKD stage and self-reported CKD awareness. Cross-sectional analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2011-2016 PARTICIPANTS: Non-pregnant adults with stages 3a (eGFR 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m2), 3b (eGFR 30-44), or 4-5 (eGFR < 30) CKD, stratified as CKD-aware/unaware. PIMs were identified on the basis of KDIGO guidelines, label information, and literature review. We calculated proportions using any and individual PIMs, assessing for differences over CKD awareness within each CKD stage. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, comorbidities, and insurance type. Adjusted proportions of U.S. adults taking any PIM(s) exceeded 50% for all CKD stages and awareness categories, and were highest among CKD-unaware patients with stages 4-5 CKD: 66.6% (95% CI, 55.5-77.8). Proton pump inhibitors, opioids, metformin, sulfonylureas, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were all used frequently across CKD stages. NSAIDs were used less frequently when CKD-aware by patients with stage 3a CKD (2.2% [95% CI, - 0.3 to 4.7] vs. 10.7% [95% CI, 7.6 to 13.8]) and stages 4-5 CKD (0.8% [95% CI, - 0.9 to 2.5] vs. 16.5% [95% CI, 4.0 to 29.0]). Metformin was used less frequently when CKD-aware by patients with stage 3b CKD (8.1% [95% CI, 0.3-15.9] vs. 26.5% [95% CI, 17.4-35.7]) and stages 4-5 CKD (none vs. 20.8% [95% CI, 1.8-39.8]). The impact of CKD awareness was statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons only for NSAIDs in stage 3a CKD. PIMs are frequently used by people with CKD, with some impact of CKD awareness on NSAID and metformin use. This may lead to adverse outcomes or hasten CKD progression, reinforcing the need for improved medication management among people with CKD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 19 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Psychology 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 21 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,226,844
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,904
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,490
of 464,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#145
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.