↓ Skip to main content

Network Archaeology: Uncovering Ancient Networks from Present-Day Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Network Archaeology: Uncovering Ancient Networks from Present-Day Interactions
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saket Navlakha, Carl Kingsford

Abstract

What proteins interacted in a long-extinct ancestor of yeast? How have different members of a protein complex assembled together over time? Our ability to answer such questions has been limited by the unavailability of ancestral protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. To overcome this limitation, we propose several novel algorithms to reconstruct the growth history of a present-day network. Our likelihood-based method finds a probable previous state of the graph by applying an assumed growth model backwards in time. This approach retains node identities so that the history of individual nodes can be tracked. Using this methodology, we estimate protein ages in the yeast PPI network that are in good agreement with sequence-based estimates of age and with structural features of protein complexes. Further, by comparing the quality of the inferred histories for several different growth models (duplication-mutation with complementarity, forest fire, and preferential attachment), we provide additional evidence that a duplication-based model captures many features of PPI network growth better than models designed to mimic social network growth. From the reconstructed history, we model the arrival time of extant and ancestral interactions and predict that complexes have significantly re-wired over time and that new edges tend to form within existing complexes. We also hypothesize a distribution of per-protein duplication rates, track the change of the network's clustering coefficient, and predict paralogous relationships between extant proteins that are likely to be complementary to the relationships inferred using sequence alone. Finally, we infer plausible parameters for the model, thereby predicting the relative probability of various evolutionary events. The success of these algorithms indicates that parts of the history of the yeast PPI are encoded in its present-day form.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 6%
United Kingdom 8 5%
Germany 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
France 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Luxembourg 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
Belgium 2 1%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 117 73%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 29%
Researcher 46 29%
Student > Master 13 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 7%
Professor 11 7%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 8 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 43%
Computer Science 29 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Mathematics 6 4%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 11 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,965,383
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,296
of 8,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,773
of 120,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#31
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.