↓ Skip to main content

A meta-analysis of the effects of therapeutic hypothermia in adult patients with traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A meta-analysis of the effects of therapeutic hypothermia in adult patients with traumatic brain injury
Published in
Critical Care, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2667-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanbing Chen, Fei Wu, Penglei Yang, Jun Shao, Qihong Chen, Ruiqiang Zheng

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
#578,129
of 14,554,924 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#520
of 4,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,619
of 330,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#86
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,554,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.