You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
水俣病発生地域における差別と抑圧の論理―新潟水俣病を中心に―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Environmental Sociology, October 1998
|
| DOI | 10.24779/jpkankyo.4.0_204 |
| Authors |
渡辺 伸一 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 29% |
| Unknown | 24 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,804,697
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Sociology
#1
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#842
of 32,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Sociology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them