↓ Skip to main content

Factors Influencing Adherence to Antiretroviral Treatment in Nepal: A Mixed-Methods Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
467 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors Influencing Adherence to Antiretroviral Treatment in Nepal: A Mixed-Methods Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035547
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharada P. Wasti, Padam Simkhada, Julian Randall, Jennifer V. Freeman, Edwin van Teijlingen

Abstract

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a lifesaver for individual patients treated for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Maintaining optimal adherence to antiretroviral drugs is essential for HIV infection management. This study aimed to understand the factors influencing adherence amongst ART-prescribed patients and care providers in Nepal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 467 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 458 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 107 23%
Researcher 51 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 10%
Student > Postgraduate 46 10%
Student > Bachelor 46 10%
Other 60 13%
Unknown 108 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 139 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 70 15%
Social Sciences 32 7%
Psychology 18 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Other 67 14%
Unknown 127 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2017.
All research outputs
#5,847,892
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#69,991
of 193,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,280
of 163,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,046
of 3,689 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,689 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.