You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of the Virus LbFV and of Wolbachia in a Host-Parasitoid Interaction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0035081 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julien Martinez, Anne Duplouy, Megan Woolfit, Fabrice Vavre, Scott L. O'Neill, Julien Varaldi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,209,663
of 24,953,268 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#51,928
of 216,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,622
of 167,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#803
of 3,765 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,953,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,765 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.