Describing a “mass shooting”: the role of databases in understanding burden

Overview of attention for article published in Injury Epidemiology, December 2019

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 367)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

So far, Altmetric has seen 127 tweets from 99 users, with an upper bound of 326,494 followers.

@BumpstockBarbie There's *always* a good sematic argument behind their use of "mass shooting", even $cience knows it https://t.co/9xKkRiK0J6

@r_0823_p いいえ、例え死亡者が出てなくても死傷者です。 https://t.co/yptowS43ZM

@inlondonsing @Feef_inthenight @Justinjpearson @RollingStone The statistics of overwhelmingly disproportionate black violent crime are abundent. However, we see a concerted effort to obfuscate this by semantics. https://t.co/3c9MjJ1CP2

@JabaraMark @dubiago @whiskey_musings @nyckatyc @POTUS ROFLMAO The Gun Violence Archive (GVA) is the source for every article you posted. According to GVA there were 417 mass shootings in 2019. The FBI says there were 30. https://t.co/8JFuiAlaP7

This page shows the most recent tweets that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 123 additional tweets.