You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differential impact of malaria control interventions on P. falciparum and P. vivax infections in young Papua New Guinean children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1456-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Ome-Kaius, Johanna Helena Kattenberg, Sophie Zaloumis, Matthew Siba, Benson Kiniboro, Shadrach Jally, Zahra Razook, Daisy Mantila, Desmond Sui, Jason Ginny, Anna Rosanas-Urgell, Stephan Karl, Thomas Obadia, Alyssa Barry, Stephen J. Rogerson, Moses Laman, Daniel Tisch, Ingrid Felger, James W. Kazura, Ivo Mueller, Leanne J. Robinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 11 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Uganda | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 59% |
| Scientists | 10 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,538,064
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,070
of 3,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,995
of 459,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#22
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.