You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lipoprotein(a) Concentration and Risks of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel F. Gudbjartsson, Gudmundur Thorgeirsson, Patrick Sulem, Anna Helgadottir, Arnaldur Gylfason, Jona Saemundsdottir, Eythor Bjornsson, Gudmundur L. Norddahl, Aslaug Jonasdottir, Adalbjorg Jonasdottir, Hannes P. Eggertsson, Solveig Gretarsdottir, Gudmar Thorleifsson, Olafur S. Indridason, Runolfur Palsson, Fridbert Jonasson, Ingileif Jonsdottir, Gudmundur I. Eyjolfsson, Olof Sigurdardottir, Isleifur Olafsson, Ragnar Danielsen, Stefan E. Matthiasson, Snaedis Kristmundsdottir, Bjarni V. Halldorsson, Astradur B. Hreidarsson, Einar M. Valdimarsson, Thorarinn Gudnason, Rafn Benediktsson, Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Hilma Holm, Kari Stefansson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 25% |
| Canada | 5 | 8% |
| Iceland | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 48% |
| Scientists | 18 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 52 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#296,175
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#671
of 17,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,081
of 482,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#18
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.