↓ Skip to main content

Influence of land use and region on glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in streams in the USA

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of land use and region on glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in streams in the USA
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, March 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Medalie, Nancy T. Baker, Megan E. Shoda, Wesley W. Stone, Michael T. Meyer, Edward G. Stets, Michaelah Wilson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 24%
Environmental Science 9 20%
Chemistry 4 9%
Engineering 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 8 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,581,350
of 19,157,212 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#1,645
of 19,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,442
of 412,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#51
of 690 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,157,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 690 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.