You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Caffeine Impairs Myocardial Blood Flow Response to Physical Exercise in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease as well as in Age-Matched Controls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0005665 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mehdi Namdar, Tiziano Schepis, Pascal Koepfli, Oliver Gaemperli, Patrick T. Siegrist, Renate Grathwohl, Ines Valenta, Raphael Delaloye, Michael Klainguti, Christophe A. Wyss, Thomas F. Lüscher, Philipp A. Kaufmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 69 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,770,758
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,761
of 195,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,561
of 97,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#76
of 504 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 504 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.