↓ Skip to main content

The paradox of cooling streams in a warming world: Regional climate trends do not parallel variable local trends in stream temperature in the Pacific continental United States

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The paradox of cooling streams in a warming world: Regional climate trends do not parallel variable local trends in stream temperature in the Pacific continental United States
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, May 2012
DOI 10.1029/2012gl051448
Authors

Ivan Arismendi, Sherri L. Johnson, Jason B. Dunham, Roy Haggerty, David Hockman-Wert

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 113 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 28%
Student > Master 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Other 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 4%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 10 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 43 36%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 26 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 20%
Engineering 6 5%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 16 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,919,192
of 16,312,448 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#4,111
of 16,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,004
of 127,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#55
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,312,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.