↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

The paradox of cooling streams in a warming world: Regional climate trends do not parallel variable local trends in stream temperature in the Pacific continental United States

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Summary Blogs Twitter Wikipedia Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The paradox of cooling streams in a warming world: Regional climate trends do not parallel variable local trends in stream temperature in the Pacific continental United States
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, May 2012
DOI 10.1029/2012gl051448
Authors

Ivan Arismendi, Sherri L. Johnson, Jason B. Dunham, Roy Haggerty, David Hockman-Wert

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 127 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 28%
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Other 9 7%
Professor 5 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 46 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 19%
Engineering 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 25 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,798,585
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#5,267
of 19,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,886
of 163,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#52
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.