↓ Skip to main content

AKATSUKI returns to Venus

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 1,531)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AKATSUKI returns to Venus
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40623-016-0457-6
Authors

Masato Nakamura, Takeshi Imamura, Nobuaki Ishii, Takumi Abe, Yasuhiro Kawakatsu, Chikako Hirose, Takehiko Satoh, Makoto Suzuki, Munetaka Ueno, Atsushi Yamazaki, Naomoto Iwagami, Shigeto Watanabe, Makoto Taguchi, Tetsuya Fukuhara, Yukihiro Takahashi, Manabu Yamada, Masataka Imai, Shoko Ohtsuki, Kazunori Uemizu, George L. Hashimoto, Masahiro Takagi, Yoshihisa Matsuda, Kazunori Ogohara, Naoki Sato, Yasumasa Kasaba, Toru Kouyama, Naru Hirata, Ryosuke Nakamura, Yukio Yamamoto, Takeshi Horinouchi, Masaru Yamamoto, Yoshi-Yuki Hayashi, Hiroki Kashimura, Ko-ichiro Sugiyama, Takeshi Sakanoi, Hiroki Ando, Shin-ya Murakami, Takao M. Sato, Seiko Takagi, Kensuke Nakajima, Javier Peralta, Yeon Joo Lee, Junichi Nakatsuka, Tsutomu Ichikawa, Kozaburo Inoue, Tomoaki Toda, Hiroyuki Toyota, Sumitaka Tachikawa, Shinichiro Narita, Tomoko Hayashiyama, Akiko Hasegawa, Yukio Kamata

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 23%
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Professor 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 49%
Physics and Astronomy 6 13%
Engineering 4 9%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,560,753
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#45
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,344
of 316,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.