↓ Skip to main content

Shortened treatment regimens versus the standard regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shortened treatment regimens versus the standard regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012918.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angeline G Grace, Abhenil Mittal, Siddharth Jain, Jaya P Tripathy, Srinath Satyanarayana, Prathap Tharyan, Richard Kirubakaran

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 17 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,332,815
of 15,405,681 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,977
of 11,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,042
of 351,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,405,681 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.