You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimental Verification of a Bigrating Beam Rider
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Review Letters, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1103/physrevlett.123.244302 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ying-Ju Lucy Chu, Nelson V. Tabiryan, Grover A. Swartzlander |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 33% |
| Researcher | 7 | 26% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 13 | 48% |
| Engineering | 6 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#342,627
of 23,666,535 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#759
of 36,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,658
of 462,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#13
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,666,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.