↓ Skip to main content

Challenges and New Approaches to Proving the Existence of Muscle Synergies of Neural Origin

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
211 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges and New Approaches to Proving the Existence of Muscle Synergies of Neural Origin
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002434
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason J. Kutch, Francisco J. Valero-Cuevas

Abstract

Muscle coordination studies repeatedly show low-dimensionality of muscle activations for a wide variety of motor tasks. The basis vectors of this low-dimensional subspace, termed muscle synergies, are hypothesized to reflect neurally-established functional muscle groupings that simplify body control. However, the muscle synergy hypothesis has been notoriously difficult to prove or falsify. We use cadaveric experiments and computational models to perform a crucial thought experiment and develop an alternative explanation of how muscle synergies could be observed without the nervous system having controlled muscles in groups. We first show that the biomechanics of the limb constrains musculotendon length changes to a low-dimensional subspace across all possible movement directions. We then show that a modest assumption--that each muscle is independently instructed to resist length change--leads to the result that electromyographic (EMG) synergies will arise without the need to conclude that they are a product of neural coupling among muscles. Finally, we show that there are dimensionality-reducing constraints in the isometric production of force in a variety of directions, but that these constraints are more easily controlled for, suggesting new experimental directions. These counter-examples to current thinking clearly show how experimenters could adequately control for the constraints described here when designing experiments to test for muscle synergies--but, to the best of our knowledge, this has not yet been done.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
India 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 344 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 112 31%
Researcher 63 17%
Student > Master 44 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 51 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 131 36%
Neuroscience 52 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 8%
Sports and Recreations 25 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 6%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 58 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2012.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,528
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,664
of 175,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#66
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.