↓ Skip to main content

Chris Reed and Andrew Murray, Rethinking the Jurisprudence of Cyberspace, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018, 256 pp, hb £72.00.

Overview of attention for article published in Modern Law Review, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chris Reed and Andrew Murray, Rethinking the Jurisprudence of Cyberspace, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018, 256 pp, hb £72.00.
Published in
Modern Law Review, December 2019
DOI 10.1111/1468-2230.12491
Authors

Mireille Hildebrandt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,869,689
of 15,153,847 outputs
Outputs from Modern Law Review
#67
of 437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,350
of 341,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Modern Law Review
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,153,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.