↓ Skip to main content

Reforma Psiquiátrica no Rio de Janeiro: situação atual e perspectivas futuras

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reforma Psiquiátrica no Rio de Janeiro: situação atual e perspectivas futuras
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, May 2016
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015215.00872016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugo Marques Fagundes Júnior, Manuel Desviat, Paulo Roberto Fagundes da Silva

Abstract

This article analyzes the mental health network in the city of Rio de Janeiro. It provides a report on the current status of the implementation of psychiatric reform and identifies progress, limitations and challenges in this area. Documentary research was carried out by examining official documents, ordinances, SUS databases, information that was available at the Superintendency of Mental Health of the city of Rio de Janeiro, and a literature review of Brazilian and international scientific articles. The results point to important advances in the de-institutionalization of care, with a substantial reduction in the numbers of psychiatric beds, and increased community facilities. However, the following significant challenges remain: the need for increased coverage by psychosocial care centers; the implementation of psychiatric beds in general hospitals; the integration of mental health with primary health care; the de-institutionalization of people who remain in hospitals for long periods; the expansion of the number of residential facilities; and an increase in the provision of specific services for people using alcohol and other drugs.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 33%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 19%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,865,572
of 12,536,156 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#221
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,580
of 262,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,536,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.