↓ Skip to main content

Frequency and distribution of neglected tropical diseases in Mozambique: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases of Poverty, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frequency and distribution of neglected tropical diseases in Mozambique: a systematic review
Published in
Infectious Diseases of Poverty, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40249-019-0613-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Berta Grau-Pujol, Marilia Massangaie, Jorge Cano, Carmen Maroto, Alcino Ndeve, Francisco Saute, Jose Muñoz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,241,164
of 14,414,290 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Diseases of Poverty
#167
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,960
of 320,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Diseases of Poverty
#18
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,414,290 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.