↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Feeding Bt MON810 Maize to Pigs for 110 Days on Intestinal Microbiota

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
33 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Effect of Feeding Bt MON810 Maize to Pigs for 110 Days on Intestinal Microbiota
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033668
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan G. Buzoianu, Maria C. Walsh, Mary C. Rea, Orla O’Sullivan, Fiona Crispie, Paul D. Cotter, R. Paul Ross, Gillian E. Gardiner, Peadar G. Lawlor

Abstract

To assess the effects of feeding Bt MON810 maize to pigs for 110 days on the intestinal microbiota.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Peru 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,177,866
of 25,128,618 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#15,049
of 217,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,140
of 168,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#228
of 3,728 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,128,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,728 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.