You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ingestion of whey hydrolysate, casein, or soy protein isolate: effects on mixed muscle protein synthesis at rest and following resistance exercise in young men
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Physiology, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00076.2009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason E. Tang, Daniel R. Moore, Gregory W. Kujbida, Mark A. Tarnopolsky, Stuart M. Phillips |
| Abstract |
This study was designed to compare the acute response of mixed muscle protein synthesis (MPS) to rapidly (i.e., whey hydrolysate and soy) and slowly (i.e., micellar casein) digested proteins both at rest and after resistance exercise. Three groups of healthy young men (n = 6 per group) performed a bout of unilateral leg resistance exercise followed by the consumption of a drink containing an equivalent content of essential amino acids (10 g) as either whey hydrolysate, micellar casein, or soy protein isolate. Mixed MPS was determined by a primed constant infusion of l-[ring-(13)C(6)]phenylalanine. Ingestion of whey protein resulted in a larger increase in blood essential amino acid, branched-chain amino acid, and leucine concentrations than either casein or soy (P < 0.05). Mixed MPS at rest (determined in the nonexercised leg) was higher with ingestion of faster proteins (whey = 0.091 +/- 0.015, soy = 0.078 +/- 0.014, casein = 0.047 +/- 0.008%/h); MPS after consumption of whey was approximately 93% greater than casein (P < 0.01) and approximately 18% greater than soy (P = 0.067). A similar result was observed after exercise (whey > soy > casein); MPS following whey consumption was approximately 122% greater than casein (P < 0.01) and 31% greater than soy (P < 0.05). MPS was also greater with soy consumption at rest (64%) and following resistance exercise (69%) compared with casein (both P < 0.01). We conclude that the feeding-induced simulation of MPS in young men is greater after whey hydrolysate or soy protein consumption than casein both at rest and after resistance exercise; moreover, despite both being fast proteins, whey hydrolysate stimulated MPS to a greater degree than soy after resistance exercise. These differences may be related to how quickly the proteins are digested (i.e., fast vs. slow) or possibly to small differences in leucine content of each protein. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 234 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 39 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 27 | 12% |
| Spain | 18 | 8% |
| Japan | 11 | 5% |
| Australia | 8 | 3% |
| Canada | 8 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 7 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Ireland | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 90 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 151 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 17% |
| Scientists | 34 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | <1% |
| Brazil | 9 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1304 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 266 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 249 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 134 | 10% |
| Researcher | 113 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 70 | 5% |
| Other | 202 | 15% |
| Unknown | 299 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 297 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 212 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 146 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 120 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 85 | 6% |
| Other | 141 | 11% |
| Unknown | 332 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 382. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#82,440
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Physiology
#31
of 9,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158
of 122,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Physiology
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.