↓ Skip to main content

SWITCH-China: A Systems Approach to Decarbonizing China’s Power System

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SWITCH-China: A Systems Approach to Decarbonizing China’s Power System
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, May 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b01345
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gang He, Anne-Perrine Avrin, James H. Nelson, Josiah Johnston, Ana Mileva, Jianwei Tian, Daniel M. Kammen

Abstract

We present an integrated model, SWITCH-China, of the Chinese power sector to analyze the economic and technological implications of a medium to long-term decarbonization scenario while accounting for very short-term renewable variability. Based on the model and assumptions used, we find that the announced 2030 carbon peak can be achieved with a carbon price of ~$40/tCO2. Current trends in renewable energy price reductions alone are insufficient to replace coal, however, an 80% carbon emission reduction by 2050 is achievable in the IPCC Target Scenario with an optimal electricity mix in 2050 including nuclear (14%), wind (23%), solar (27%), hydro (6%), gas (1%), coal (3%), CCS coal (26%). The co-benefits of carbon-price strategy would offset 22% to 42% of the increased electricity costs if the true cost of coal and social cost of carbon are incorporated. In such a scenario, aggressive attention to research and both technological and financial innovation mechanisms are crucial to enable the transition at reasonable cost, along with strong carbon policies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 18%
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 57 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Energy 22 13%
Engineering 21 13%
Environmental Science 14 8%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 76 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,309,367
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#5,137
of 20,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,115
of 350,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#73
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.