↓ Skip to main content

What determines the downstream evolution of turbidity currents?

Overview of attention for article published in Earth & Planetary Science Letters, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What determines the downstream evolution of turbidity currents?
Published in
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, February 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.116023
Authors

Catharina J. Heerema, Peter J. Talling, Matthieu J. Cartigny, Charles K. Paull, Lewis Bailey, Stephen M. Simmons, Daniel R. Parsons, Michael A. Clare, Roberto Gwiazda, Eve Lundsten, Krystle Anderson, Katherine L. Maier, Jingping P. Xu, Esther J. Sumner, Kurt Rosenberger, Jenny Gales, Mary McGann, Lionel Carter, Edward Pope

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 27%
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 36 54%
Engineering 8 12%
Unspecified 3 4%
Energy 1 1%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 14 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,086,591
of 17,803,527 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#371
of 4,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,070
of 396,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#12
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,803,527 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.