You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The “Timeline Debriefing Tool”: a tool for structuring the debriefing description phase
|
---|---|
Published in |
Advances in Simulation, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41077-019-0119-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thierry Secheresse, Séverine Nonglaton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 10% |
Australia | 2 | 10% |
Italy | 1 | 5% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
Professor | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 24% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 18% |
Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,773,475
of 24,291,750 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#85
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,889
of 465,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,291,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.