↓ Skip to main content

Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002678
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte K. Hemelrijk, Jan Wantia, Karin Isler

Abstract

The processes that underlie the formation of the dominance hierarchy in a group are since long under debate. Models of self-organisation suggest that dominance hierarchies develop by the self-reinforcing effects of winning and losing fights (the so-called winner-loser effect), but according to 'the prior attribute hypothesis', dominance hierarchies develop from pre-existing individual differences, such as in body mass. In the present paper, we investigate the relevance of each of these two theories for the degree of female dominance over males. We investigate this in a correlative study in which we compare female dominance between groups of 22 species throughout the primate order. In our study female dominance may range from 0 (no female dominance) to 1 (complete female dominance). As regards 'the prior attribute hypothesis', we expected a negative correlation between female dominance over males and species-specific sexual dimorphism in body mass. However, to our surprise we found none (we use the method of independent contrasts). Instead, we confirm the self-organisation hypothesis: our model based on the winner-loser effect predicts that female dominance over males increases with the percentage of males in the group. We confirm this pattern at several levels in empirical data (among groups of a single species and between species of the same genus and of different ones). Since the winner-loser effect has been shown to work in many taxa including humans, these results may have broad implications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 176 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 18%
Student > Bachelor 35 18%
Researcher 34 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 19 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 51%
Psychology 17 9%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Environmental Science 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 25 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,291,794
of 25,286,324 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#16,292
of 219,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,850
of 94,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#43
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,286,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.