You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Examining the episodic context account: does retrieval practice enhance memory for context?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41235-019-0202-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Min Kyung Hong, Sean M. Polyn, Lisa K. Fazio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 89% |
| Singapore | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 89% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,306,628
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#170
of 373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,537
of 481,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.