↓ Skip to main content

Attachment and the archive: barriers and facilitators to the use of historical sociology as complementary developmental science

Overview of attention for article published in Science in Context, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attachment and the archive: barriers and facilitators to the use of historical sociology as complementary developmental science
Published in
Science in Context, December 2019
DOI 10.1017/s0269889719000243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robbie Duschinsky

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 33%
Lecturer 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 33%
Computer Science 1 33%
Social Sciences 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,523,535
of 15,404,980 outputs
Outputs from Science in Context
#66
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,724
of 343,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science in Context
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,404,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.