↓ Skip to main content

Open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery ERAS® programme (ORANGE II – Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery ERAS® programme (ORANGE II – Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-54
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald M van Dam, Edgar M Wong-Lun-Hing, Gerard JP van Breukelen, Jan HMB Stoot, Joost R van der Vorst, Marc HA Bemelmans, Steven WM Olde Damink, Kristoffer Lassen, Cornelis HC Dejong, ORANGE II Study Group

Abstract

The use of lLaparoscopic liver resection in terms of time to functional recovery, length of hospital stay (LOS), long-term abdominal wall hernias, costs and quality of life (QOL) has never been studied in a randomised controlled trial. Therefore, this is the subject of the international multicentre randomised controlled ORANGE II trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 115 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 18 15%
Other 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 35 29%