↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Carbohydrate quality changes and concurrent changes in cardiovascular risk factors: a longitudinal analysis in the PREDIMED-Plus randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
Summary News Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbohydrate quality changes and concurrent changes in cardiovascular risk factors: a longitudinal analysis in the PREDIMED-Plus randomized trial
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, February 2020
DOI 10.1093/ajcn/nqz298
Pubmed ID
31868210
Authors

Miguel A Martínez-González, Cesar I Fernandez-Lazaro, Estefanía Toledo, Andrés Díaz-López, Dolores Corella, Albert Goday, Dora Romaguera, Jesús Vioque, Ángel M Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, J Alfredo Martínez, Luís Serra-Majem, Ramon Estruch, Francisco J Tinahones, José Lapetra, Xavier Pintó, Josep A Tur, José López-Miranda, Naomi Cano-Ibáñez, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez, Pilar Matía-Martín, Lidia Daimiel, Vicente Martín Sánchez, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Emilio Ros, Pilar Buil-Cosiales, Olga Portoles, María Soria-Florido, Jadwiga Konieczna, Eva M Navarrete-Muñoz, Lucas Tojal-Sierra, José C Fernández-García, Itziar Abete, Patricia Henríquez-Sánchez, Araceli Muñoz-Garach, José M Santos-Lozano, Emili Corbella, Maria del Mar Bibiloni, Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Rocío Barragán, Olga Castañer, Miquel Fiol, Manoli García de la Hera, María C Belló-Mora, Alfredo Gea, Nancy Babio, Montse Fitó, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Itziar Zazpe, Jordi Salas-Salvadó

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 224 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Researcher 23 10%
Unspecified 19 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Master 17 8%
Other 54 24%
Unknown 67 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 15%
Unspecified 18 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 84 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#520,535
of 23,660,057 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1,205
of 12,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,585
of 453,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#15
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,660,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.