You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Predator-informed looming stimulus experiments reveal how large filter feeding whales capture highly maneuverable forage fish
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1911099116 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David E. Cade, Nicholas Carey, Paolo Domenici, Jean Potvin, Jeremy A. Goldbogen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 23 | 17% |
Japan | 16 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
France | 3 | 2% |
New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
Australia | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 2 | 1% |
Bahamas | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 73 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 99 | 73% |
Scientists | 33 | 24% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
Researcher | 11 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 8% |
Engineering | 6 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 294. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#120,919
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2,557
of 103,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,690
of 481,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#64
of 938 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 938 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.