↓ Skip to main content

Troubling the non-specialist prescription of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): the views of Australian HIV experts

Overview of attention for article published in Health Sociology Review, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Troubling the non-specialist prescription of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): the views of Australian HIV experts
Published in
Health Sociology Review, December 2019
DOI 10.1080/14461242.2019.1703781
Authors

Anthony K J Smith, Martin Holt, Shana D. Hughes, Hong-Ha M. Truong, Christy E. Newman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,337,476
of 19,391,192 outputs
Outputs from Health Sociology Review
#73
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,699
of 408,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Sociology Review
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,391,192 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.