↓ Skip to main content

Cleft sidedness and congenitally missing teeth in patients with cleft lip and palate patients

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cleft sidedness and congenitally missing teeth in patients with cleft lip and palate patients
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40510-016-0127-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdolreza Jamilian, Alessandra Lucchese, Alireza Darnahal, Zinat Kamali, Letizia Perillo

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of cleft sidedness, and the number of congenitally missing teeth in regard to cleft type and gender. The charts, models, radiographs, and intraoral photographs of 201 cleft patients including 131 males with the mean age of 12.3 ± 4 years and 70 females with the mean age of 12.6 ± 3.9 years were used for the study. T test, Chi-square, and binomial tests were used for assessment of the data. One hundred forty-eight of the subjects suffered from cleft lip and palate followed by 41 subjects who suffered from cleft lip and alveolus. Chi-square test did not show any significant difference between the genders. Binomial test showed that left-sided cleft was more predominant in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients (P < 0.001). This study also showed that the upper lateral incisors were the most commonly missing teeth in the cleft area.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Unspecified 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Design 1 5%
Unknown 9 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2016.
All research outputs
#4,030,877
of 7,757,128 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#67
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,764
of 268,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,757,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.