↓ Skip to main content

Response to Correspondence from Kolstoe and colleagues concerning our paper entitled, Research approvals iceberg: How a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response to Correspondence from Kolstoe and colleagues concerning our paper entitled, Research approvals iceberg: How a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0433-3
Authors

Mila Petrova, Stephen Barclay

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 1 7%