You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Response to Correspondence from Kolstoe and colleagues concerning our paper entitled, Research approvals iceberg: How a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0433-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mila Petrova, Stephen Barclay |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 36% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |