↓ Skip to main content

Temporal Lobe Cortical Electrical Stimulation during the Encoding and Retrieval Phase Reduces False Memories

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Temporal Lobe Cortical Electrical Stimulation during the Encoding and Retrieval Phase Reduces False Memories
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004959
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo S. Boggio, Felipe Fregni, Claudia Valasek, Sophie Ellwood, Richard Chi, Jason Gallate, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Allan Snyder

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 4%
Germany 4 2%
Italy 4 2%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 215 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 16%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Professor 17 7%
Other 61 25%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 99 40%
Neuroscience 31 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 7%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 39 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,433,234
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#18,709
of 195,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,080
of 93,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#64
of 505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.