You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Scientist’s guide to developing explanatory statistical models using causal analysis principles
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecology, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/ecy.2962 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James B. Grace, Kathryn M. Irvine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 40% |
Brazil | 3 | 10% |
France | 2 | 7% |
South Africa | 2 | 7% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Czechia | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 47% |
Scientists | 14 | 47% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 249 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 24% |
Researcher | 55 | 22% |
Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
Other | 29 | 12% |
Unknown | 47 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 80 | 32% |
Environmental Science | 66 | 27% |
Engineering | 6 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 1% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 1% |
Other | 18 | 7% |
Unknown | 73 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,995,515
of 25,346,731 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#932
of 6,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,120
of 400,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#30
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,346,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.