↓ Skip to main content

You sound familiar: carrion crows can differentiate between the calls of known and unknown heterospecifics

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
You sound familiar: carrion crows can differentiate between the calls of known and unknown heterospecifics
Published in
Animal Cognition, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10071-012-0508-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia A. F. Wascher, Georgine Szipl, Markus Boeckle, Anna Wilkinson

Abstract

In group-living animals, it is adaptive to recognize conspecifics on the basis of familiarity or group membership as it allows association with preferred social partners and avoidance of competitors. However, animals do not only associate with conspecifics but also with heterospecifics, for example in mixed-species flocks. Consequently, between-species recognition, based either on familiarity or even individual recognition, is likely to be beneficial. The extent to which animals can distinguish between familiar and unfamiliar heterospecifics is currently unclear. In the present study, we investigated the ability of eight carrion crows to differentiate between the voices and calls of familiar and unfamiliar humans and jackdaws. The crows responded significantly more often to unfamiliar than familiar human playbacks and, conversely, responded more to familiar than unfamiliar jackdaw calls. Our results provide the first evidence that birds can discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar heterospecific individuals using auditory stimuli.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Hungary 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 126 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 27%
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Student > Master 19 14%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 61%
Psychology 8 6%
Philosophy 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 23 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#699,646
of 23,950,095 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#175
of 1,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,462
of 166,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,950,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.