You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study protocol for the multicentre cohorts of Zika virus infection in pregnant women, infants, and acute clinical cases in Latin America and the Caribbean: the ZIKAlliance consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-019-4685-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vivian I. Avelino-Silva, Philippe Mayaud, Adriana Tami, Maria C. Miranda, Kerstin D. Rosenberger, Neal Alexander, Luis Nacul, Aluisio Segurado, Moritz Pohl, Sarah Bethencourt, Luis A. Villar, Isabelle F. T. Viana, Renata Rabello, Carmen Soria, Silvia P. Salgado, Eduardo Gotuzzo, María G. Guzmán, Pedro A. Martínez, Hugo López-Gatell, Jennifer Hegewisch-Taylor, Victor H. Borja-Aburto, Cesar Gonzalez, Eduardo M. Netto, Paola M. Saba Villarroel, Bruno Hoen, Patrícia Brasil, Ernesto T. A. Marques, Barry Rockx, Marion Koopmans, Xavier de Lamballerie, Thomas Jaenisch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 33% |
| Brazil | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 69% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 65 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 75 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,644,956
of 25,824,818 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#400
of 8,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,490
of 481,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#7
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,824,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.