You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bt Crop Effects on Functional Guilds of Non-Target Arthropods: A Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0002118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. LaReesa Wolfenbarger, Steven E. Naranjo, Jonathan G. Lundgren, Royce J. Bitzer, Lidia S. Watrud |
| Abstract |
Uncertainty persists over the environmental effects of genetically-engineered crops that produce the insecticidal Cry proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). We performed meta-analyses on a modified public database to synthesize current knowledge about the effects of Bt cotton, maize and potato on the abundance and interactions of arthropod non-target functional guilds. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Réunion | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 221 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 12% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 151 | 61% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 43 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,630,587
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#21,111
of 193,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,930
of 78,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#50
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.