↓ Skip to main content

The NASSS framework for ex post theorisation of technology-supported change in healthcare: worked example of the TORPEDO programme

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
72 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The NASSS framework for ex post theorisation of technology-supported change in healthcare: worked example of the TORPEDO programme
Published in
BMC Medicine, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12916-019-1463-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seye Abimbola, Bindu Patel, David Peiris, Anushka Patel, Mark Harris, Tim Usherwood, Trisha Greenhalgh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Psychology 5 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Other 20 29%
Unknown 14 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2021.
All research outputs
#581,865
of 16,581,438 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#465
of 2,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,398
of 383,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#51
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,581,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.