↓ Skip to main content

Craniosacral therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 3,136)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
79 tweeters
facebook
17 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Craniosacral therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12891-019-3017-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heidemarie Haller, Romy Lauche, Tobias Sundberg, Gustav Dobos, Holger Cramer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Other 8 8%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 17%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 34 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2020.
All research outputs
#329,831
of 16,264,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#40
of 3,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,199
of 373,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#8
of 330 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,264,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 330 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.