↓ Skip to main content

Leadership in Orchestra Emerges from the Causal Relationships of Movement Kinematics

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
28 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Leadership in Orchestra Emerges from the Causal Relationships of Movement Kinematics
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035757
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro D'Ausilio, Leonardo Badino, Yi Li, Sera Tokay, Laila Craighero, Rosario Canto, Yiannis Aloimonos, Luciano Fadiga

Abstract

Non-verbal communication enables efficient transfer of information among people. In this context, classic orchestras are a remarkable instance of interaction and communication aimed at a common aesthetic goal: musicians train for years in order to acquire and share a non-linguistic framework for sensorimotor communication. To this end, we recorded violinists' and conductors' movement kinematics during execution of Mozart pieces, searching for causal relationships among musicians by using the Granger Causality method (GC). We show that the increase of conductor-to-musicians influence, together with the reduction of musician-to-musician coordination (an index of successful leadership) goes in parallel with quality of execution, as assessed by musical experts' judgments. Rigorous quantification of sensorimotor communication efficacy has always been complicated and affected by rather vague qualitative methodologies. Here we propose that the analysis of motor behavior provides a potentially interesting tool to approach the rather intangible concept of aesthetic quality of music and visual communication efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 1097 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 162 15%
Other 43 4%
Researcher 38 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 3%
Student > Postgraduate 29 3%
Other 84 8%
Unknown 724 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 77 7%
Computer Science 52 5%
Psychology 45 4%
Engineering 34 3%
Arts and Humanities 30 3%
Other 118 11%
Unknown 757 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,213,816
of 25,845,749 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#15,347
of 224,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,338
of 178,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#230
of 3,841 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,841 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.