You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiple Measures Reveal Antiretroviral Adherence Successes and Challenges in HIV-Infected Ugandan Children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0036737 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica E. Haberer, Julius Kiwanuka, Denis Nansera, Kathleen Ragland, Claude Mellins, David R. Bangsberg |
| Abstract |
Adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) among children in developing settings is poorly understood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Egypt | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 18% |
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 30% |
| Psychology | 25 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 37 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2012.
All research outputs
#12,853,846
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#100,075
of 193,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,771
of 163,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,842
of 3,797 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,797 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.