You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Drug detection dogs in Australia: More bark than bite?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Drug & Alcohol Review, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00431.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
SOPHIE HICKEY, FAIRLIE MCILWRAITH, RAIMONDO BRUNO, ALLISON MATTHEWS, ROSA ALATI |
Abstract |
Canines are often used by police for drug detection and deterrence. However, their effectiveness has been questioned. This paper aims to describe the experience of regular illicit drug users when in contact with drug detection dogs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 27% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 18% |
Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 8 | 16% |
Psychology | 6 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#784,579
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Drug & Alcohol Review
#129
of 1,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,625
of 168,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug & Alcohol Review
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.