You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Adjunctive antioxidants for bipolar disorder
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Pedro V S Magalhães, Olivia Dean, Ana Cristina Andreazza, Michael Berk, Flávio Kapczinski
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||2||11%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||2||11%|
|Student > Master||2||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||11%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||5%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
of 24,178,331 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 178,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,178,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.