↓ Skip to main content

Does a sum of toxic units exceeding 1 imply adverse impacts on macroinvertebrate assemblages? A field study in a northern Japanese river receiving treated mine discharge

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does a sum of toxic units exceeding 1 imply adverse impacts on macroinvertebrate assemblages? A field study in a northern Japanese river receiving treated mine discharge
Published in
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10661-019-8047-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuichi Iwasaki, Megumi Fujisawa, Tagiru Ogino, Hiroyuki Mano, Naohide Shinohara, Shigeki Masunaga, Masashi Kamo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 11 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#15,498,675
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#1,333
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,615
of 461,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#29
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.