You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Existential loneliness and end-of-life care: A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11017-010-9141-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric J. Ettema, Louise D. Derksen, Evert van Leeuwen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 63 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,292,947
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#22
of 382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,160
of 105,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them