↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating posterior cruciate ligament injury by using two-dimensional ultrasonography and sonoelastography

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating posterior cruciate ligament injury by using two-dimensional ultrasonography and sonoelastography
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00167-016-4139-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin-Yi Wang, Tsung-hsun Yang, Yu-Chi Huang, Wen-Yi Chou, Chung-Cheng Huang, Ching-Jen Wang

Abstract

This study aimed to elucidate the diagnostic criteria for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury using ultrasonography. Thirty-three patients with clinically suspected PCL injuries and 30 normal control subjects were recruited. Both groups were assessed using sonographic examination with reliability testing. Patients also underwent posterior stress radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PCL thickness on two-dimensional ultrasonography (2D US), pixel intensity on sonoelastography, displacement on posterior stress view, and severity grading using MRI were analysed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted using MRI as the gold standard. Correlation coefficients among variables were calculated. Good to excellent reliabilities were noted for 2D US and red pixel intensity on sonoelastography. In injured knees, PCL thicknesses were significantly greater, and red pixel intensities were significantly lower, compared to non-injured knees of patients and healthy controls. This indicates increased swelling and softness in injured PCLs. The area under the PCL thickness ROC curve was 0.917 (p < 0.001), and the best diagnostic criterion was a thickness ≥6.5 mm (90.6 % sensitivity and 86.7 % specificity). Thickness correlated with red pixel intensity, International Knee Documentation Committee examination grade, and MRI severity grading. In addition, effusions were detected on 2D US in all knees with "tears" of other structures on MRI. 2D US is a useful tool to diagnose PCL injury, and PCL thickness ≥6.5 mm is the recommended diagnostic criterion. II.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 15 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,422,671
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#644
of 2,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,598
of 298,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#13
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.