↓ Skip to main content

Intermittent Motion in Desert Locusts: Behavioural Complexity in Simple Environments

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intermittent Motion in Desert Locusts: Behavioural Complexity in Simple Environments
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002498
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sepideh Bazazi, Frederic Bartumeus, Joseph J. Hale, Iain D. Couzin

Abstract

Animals can exhibit complex movement patterns that may be the result of interactions with their environment or may be directly the mechanism by which their behaviour is governed. In order to understand the drivers of these patterns we examine the movement behaviour of individual desert locusts in a homogenous experimental arena with minimal external cues. Locust motion is intermittent and we reveal that as pauses become longer, the probability that a locust changes direction from its previous direction of travel increases. Long pauses (of greater than 100 s) can be considered reorientation bouts, while shorter pauses (of less than 6 s) appear to act as periods of resting between displacements. We observe power-law behaviour in the distribution of move and pause lengths of over 1.5 orders of magnitude. While Lévy features do exist, locusts' movement patterns are more fully described by considering moves, pauses and turns in combination. Further analysis reveals that these combinations give rise to two behavioural modes that are organized in time: local search behaviour (long exploratory pauses with short moves) and relocation behaviour (long displacement moves with shorter resting pauses). These findings offer a new perspective on how complex animal movement patterns emerge in nature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 114 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Student > Master 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Professor 7 6%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 39%
Physics and Astronomy 13 11%
Environmental Science 8 7%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2017.
All research outputs
#14,728,114
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,162
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,069
of 176,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#60
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.