You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On-site clinical mentoring as a maternal and new-born care quality improvement method: evidence from a nurse cohort study in Nepal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nursing, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12912-019-0396-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Goyet, Swaraj Rajbhandari, Valerie Broch Alvarez, Aida Bayou, Sirjana Khanal, Tara Nath Pokhrel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Nepal | 1 | 17% |
| Colombia | 1 | 17% |
| Thailand | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 43 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 21% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 46 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,110,949
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#170
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,241
of 456,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.